IVV vs VV: how much do they really overlap?
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, tracking the S&P 500) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Large Cap) overlap by roughly 91% by weight. 10 of IVV's top 10 holdings also appear in VV. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 52 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade B). In short, the two funds hold nearly the same stocks in nearly the same proportions — owning both is largely redundant.
The same companies, in both funds
These 46 holdings appear in both IVV and VV. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.
| Holding | in IVV | in VV |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA CORP | 7.37% | 7.26% |
| AAPL APPLE INC | 7.64% | 6.71% |
| MSFT MICROSOFT CORP | 5.23% | 4.38% |
| AMZN AMAZON.COM INC | 3.60% | 3.64% |
| GOOGL ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 3.05% | 3.31% |
| AVGO BROADCOM INC | 2.87% | 2.82% |
| GOOG ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 2.46% | 2.61% |
| META META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A | 1.85% | 1.95% |
| MU MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.54% | 2.06% |
| LLY ELI LILLY | 1.43% | 1.61% |
| TSLA TESLA INC | 1.36% | 1.87% |
| JPM JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.47% | 1.29% |
| AMD ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.24% | 1.50% |
| JNJ JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.96% | 0.97% |
| V VISA INC CLASS A | 0.95% | 0.83% |
+ 31 more shared holdings.
Only in IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF — US large-cap. Its biggest holdings that VV doesn’t have:
| BRKB BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 1.46% |
| XOM EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.02% |
| TMO THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC | 0.33% |
| AMGN AMGEN INC | 0.33% |
Only in VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF — US large-cap. Its biggest holdings that IVV doesn’t have:
| BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B | 1.40% |
| SNDK Sandisk Corp. | 0.53% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology Inc. | 0.42% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corp. | 0.42% |
So — nearly identical. Should you hold both?
IVV and VV hold nearly the same stocks in nearly the same proportions — owning both is largely redundant. If you already hold IVV, adding VV mostly increases your bet on the names they share rather than spreading it — a 50/50 blend still behaves like only ~52 equal positions, with the top 10 alone at 37% and the Magnificent Seven at 32%.
Holdings as of — IVV: Jul 30, 2026 (iShares (BlackRock)); VV: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.
See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →IVV vs VV — FAQ
- How much do IVV and VV overlap?
- IVV and VV overlap by approximately 91% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 10 of IVV's 10 largest holdings are also held by VV. They share 46 of their listed top holdings in total.
- Is it redundant to hold both IVV and VV?
- Because they hold nearly the same stocks in nearly the same proportions — owning both is largely redundant, holding both is largely redundant — you mostly duplicate the same megacaps and concentrate rather than diversify. A 50/50 blend has an effective 52 positions and a B diversification grade.
- What does VV hold that IVV doesn't?
- VV's largest holdings that IVV doesn't hold include BRK.B, SNDK, MRVL, IBM. Its category is US large-cap, versus IVV's US large-cap.
- Which is more concentrated, IVV or VV?
- IVV's top 10 holdings are 59% of its listed weight; VV's are 58%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.