Meshfolio
FUND OVERLAP · LOOK-THROUGH

VB vs VTI: how much do they really overlap?

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Small Cap) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF, tracking the CRSP US Total Market) overlap by roughly 0% by weight. 0 of VB's top 10 holdings also appear in VTI. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 269 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade A). In short, the two funds hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant.

0%
weight overlap
0/10
of VB’s top 10 also in VTI
A
50/50 blend grade
~269
real bets in a 50/50 blend

The same companies, in both funds

These 0 holdings appear in both VB and VTI. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.

Holdingin VBin VTI

Only in VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETFUS small-cap. Its biggest holdings that VTI doesn’t have:

CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.0.54%
JBL Jabil Inc.0.49%
RVMD Revolution Medicines Inc.0.45%
ALAB Astera Labs Inc.0.45%
NTRA Natera Inc.0.44%
EME EMCOR Group Inc.0.44%
TWLO Twilio Inc. Class A0.37%
NRG NRG Energy Inc.0.37%

Only in VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETFtotal US market. Its biggest holdings that VB doesn’t have:

NVDA NVIDIA Corp.6.32%
AAPL Apple Inc.5.84%
MSFT Microsoft Corp.3.81%
AMZN Amazon.com Inc.3.17%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A2.88%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.2.46%
GOOG Alphabet Inc. Class C2.27%
MU Micron Technology Inc.1.79%

So — essentially different. Should you hold both?

VB and VTI hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant. Held together they genuinely broaden your exposure — a 50/50 blend reaches ~269 effective positions (grade A), because they hold largely different securities.

Holdings as of — VB: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard); VTI: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.

See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →

VB vs VTI — FAQ

How much do VB and VTI overlap?
VB and VTI overlap by approximately 0% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 0 of VB's 10 largest holdings are also held by VTI. They share 0 of their listed top holdings in total.
Is it redundant to hold both VB and VTI?
Because they hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant, holding both is not redundant — each fund covers largely different holdings, so together they broaden your exposure. A 50/50 blend has an effective 269 positions and a A diversification grade.
What does VTI hold that VB doesn't?
VTI's largest holdings that VB doesn't hold include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL. Its category is total US market, versus VB's US small-cap.
Which is more concentrated, VB or VTI?
VB's top 10 holdings are 27% of its listed weight; VTI's are 58%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.

Related comparisons