IVV vs VB: how much do they really overlap?
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, tracking the S&P 500) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Small Cap) overlap by roughly 0% by weight. 0 of IVV's top 10 holdings also appear in VB. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 191 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade A). In short, the two funds hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant.
The same companies, in both funds
These 0 holdings appear in both IVV and VB. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.
| Holding | in IVV | in VB |
|---|
Only in IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF — US large-cap. Its biggest holdings that VB doesn’t have:
| AAPL APPLE INC | 7.64% |
| NVDA NVIDIA CORP | 7.37% |
| MSFT MICROSOFT CORP | 5.23% |
| AMZN AMAZON.COM INC | 3.60% |
| GOOGL ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 3.05% |
| AVGO BROADCOM INC | 2.87% |
| GOOG ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 2.46% |
| META META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A | 1.85% |
Only in VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF — US small-cap. Its biggest holdings that IVV doesn’t have:
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 0.54% |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.49% |
| RVMD Revolution Medicines Inc. | 0.45% |
| ALAB Astera Labs Inc. | 0.45% |
| NTRA Natera Inc. | 0.44% |
| EME EMCOR Group Inc. | 0.44% |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. Class A | 0.37% |
| NRG NRG Energy Inc. | 0.37% |
So — essentially different. Should you hold both?
IVV and VB hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant. Held together they genuinely broaden your exposure — a 50/50 blend reaches ~191 effective positions (grade A), because they hold largely different securities.
Holdings as of — IVV: Jul 30, 2026 (iShares (BlackRock)); VB: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.
See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →IVV vs VB — FAQ
- How much do IVV and VB overlap?
- IVV and VB overlap by approximately 0% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 0 of IVV's 10 largest holdings are also held by VB. They share 0 of their listed top holdings in total.
- Is it redundant to hold both IVV and VB?
- Because they hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant, holding both is not redundant — each fund covers largely different holdings, so together they broaden your exposure. A 50/50 blend has an effective 191 positions and a A diversification grade.
- What does VB hold that IVV doesn't?
- VB's largest holdings that IVV doesn't hold include CRDO, JBL, RVMD, ALAB, NTRA. Its category is US small-cap, versus IVV's US large-cap.
- Which is more concentrated, IVV or VB?
- IVV's top 10 holdings are 59% of its listed weight; VB's are 27%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.