Meshfolio
FUND OVERLAP · LOOK-THROUGH

VB vs VEA: how much do they really overlap?

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Small Cap) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF, tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US) overlap by roughly 0% by weight. 0 of VB's top 10 holdings also appear in VEA. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 1029 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade A). In short, the two funds hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant.

0%
weight overlap
0/10
of VB’s top 10 also in VEA
A
50/50 blend grade
~1029
real bets in a 50/50 blend

The same companies, in both funds

These 0 holdings appear in both VB and VEA. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.

Holdingin VBin VEA

Only in VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETFUS small-cap. Its biggest holdings that VEA doesn’t have:

FLEX Flex Ltd.0.69%
ALAB Astera Labs Inc.0.62%
CIEN Ciena Corp.0.51%
RKLB Rocket Lab Corp.0.50%
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.0.48%
BE Bloom Energy Corp. Class A0.47%
EME EMCOR Group Inc.0.46%
JBL Jabil Inc.0.45%

Only in VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETFdeveloped ex-US. Its biggest holdings that VB doesn’t have:

005930 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.2.99%
000660 SK hynix Inc2.55%
ASML ASML Holding NV1.90%
HSBA HSBC Holdings plc0.98%
ROP Roche Holding AG0.89%
NOVN Novartis AG0.87%
AZN AstraZeneca plc0.84%
RY Royal Bank of Canada0.81%

So — essentially different. Should you hold both?

VB and VEA hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant. Held together they genuinely broaden your exposure — a 50/50 blend reaches ~1029 effective positions (grade A), because they hold largely different securities.

Holdings as of — VB: May 31, 2026 (Vanguard); VEA: May 31, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.

See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →

VB vs VEA — FAQ

How much do VB and VEA overlap?
VB and VEA overlap by approximately 0% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 0 of VB's 10 largest holdings are also held by VEA. They share 0 of their listed top holdings in total.
Is it redundant to hold both VB and VEA?
Because they hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant, holding both is not redundant — each fund covers largely different holdings, so together they broaden your exposure. A 50/50 blend has an effective 1029 positions and a A diversification grade.
What does VEA hold that VB doesn't?
VEA's largest holdings that VB doesn't hold include 005930, 000660, ASML, HSBA, ROP. Its category is developed ex-US, versus VB's US small-cap.
Which is more concentrated, VB or VEA?
VB's top 10 holdings are 29% of its listed weight; VEA's are 43%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.

Related comparisons