VB vs VV: how much do they really overlap?
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Small Cap) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Large Cap) overlap by roughly 0% by weight. 0 of VB's top 10 holdings also appear in VV. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 207 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade A). In short, the two funds hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant.
The same companies, in both funds
These 0 holdings appear in both VB and VV. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.
| Holding | in VB | in VV |
|---|
Only in VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF — US small-cap. Its biggest holdings that VV doesn’t have:
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 0.54% |
| JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.49% |
| RVMD Revolution Medicines Inc. | 0.45% |
| ALAB Astera Labs Inc. | 0.45% |
| NTRA Natera Inc. | 0.44% |
| EME EMCOR Group Inc. | 0.44% |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. Class A | 0.37% |
| NRG NRG Energy Inc. | 0.37% |
Only in VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF — US large-cap. Its biggest holdings that VB doesn’t have:
| NVDA NVIDIA Corp. | 7.26% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 6.71% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corp. | 4.38% |
| AMZN Amazon.com Inc. | 3.64% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 3.31% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 2.82% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. Class C | 2.61% |
| MU Micron Technology Inc. | 2.06% |
So — essentially different. Should you hold both?
VB and VV hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant. Held together they genuinely broaden your exposure — a 50/50 blend reaches ~207 effective positions (grade A), because they hold largely different securities.
Holdings as of — VB: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard); VV: Jun 30, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.
See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →VB vs VV — FAQ
- How much do VB and VV overlap?
- VB and VV overlap by approximately 0% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 0 of VB's 10 largest holdings are also held by VV. They share 0 of their listed top holdings in total.
- Is it redundant to hold both VB and VV?
- Because they hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant, holding both is not redundant — each fund covers largely different holdings, so together they broaden your exposure. A 50/50 blend has an effective 207 positions and a A diversification grade.
- What does VV hold that VB doesn't?
- VV's largest holdings that VB doesn't hold include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL. Its category is US large-cap, versus VB's US small-cap.
- Which is more concentrated, VB or VV?
- VB's top 10 holdings are 27% of its listed weight; VV's are 58%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.