Meshfolio
FUND OVERLAP · LOOK-THROUGH

VB vs VV: how much do they really overlap?

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Small Cap) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF, tracking the CRSP US Large Cap) overlap by roughly 0% by weight. 0 of VB's top 10 holdings also appear in VV. A 50/50 blend of the two behaves like about 181 equally-weighted bets (diversification grade A). In short, the two funds hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant.

0%
weight overlap
0/10
of VB’s top 10 also in VV
A
50/50 blend grade
~181
real bets in a 50/50 blend

The same companies, in both funds

These 0 holdings appear in both VB and VV. The weight columns show how much of each fund each name represents.

Holdingin VBin VV

Only in VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETFUS small-cap. Its biggest holdings that VV doesn’t have:

FLEX Flex Ltd.0.69%
ALAB Astera Labs Inc.0.62%
CIEN Ciena Corp.0.51%
RKLB Rocket Lab Corp.0.50%
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.0.48%
BE Bloom Energy Corp. Class A0.47%
EME EMCOR Group Inc.0.46%
JBL Jabil Inc.0.45%

Only in VV

Vanguard Large-Cap ETFUS large-cap. Its biggest holdings that VB doesn’t have:

NVDA NVIDIA Corp.7.65%
AAPL Apple Inc.7.19%
MSFT Microsoft Corp.5.25%
AMZN Amazon.com Inc.4.10%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A3.47%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.3.32%
GOOG Alphabet Inc. Class C2.73%
META Facebook Inc. Class A2.17%

So — essentially different. Should you hold both?

VB and VV hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant. Held together they genuinely broaden your exposure — a 50/50 blend reaches ~181 effective positions (grade A), because they hold largely different securities.

Holdings as of — VB: May 31, 2026 (Vanguard); VV: May 31, 2026 (Vanguard). Refreshed monthly. Overlap is measured across each fund’s largest holdings (top 50); the diffuse long tail barely moves the math.

See this for YOUR whole portfolio, free →

VB vs VV — FAQ

How much do VB and VV overlap?
VB and VV overlap by approximately 0% measured by portfolio weight — that is the share of the smaller fund's holdings (by weight) that also sit inside the other. 0 of VB's 10 largest holdings are also held by VV. They share 0 of their listed top holdings in total.
Is it redundant to hold both VB and VV?
Because they hold almost none of the same securities — they are complementary, not redundant, holding both is not redundant — each fund covers largely different holdings, so together they broaden your exposure. A 50/50 blend has an effective 181 positions and a A diversification grade.
What does VV hold that VB doesn't?
VV's largest holdings that VB doesn't hold include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL. Its category is US large-cap, versus VB's US small-cap.
Which is more concentrated, VB or VV?
VB's top 10 holdings are 29% of its listed weight; VV's are 61%. The more concentrated fund leans harder on its largest names.

Related comparisons